Roof Crush Injuries

Roof Crush Injuries

For less than $100 per car, auto manufacturers have the ability to strengthen roofs to the point that most lives lost from roof failure would have been saved.  Joan Claybrook, public safety advocate and former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) from 1977 to 1980, says roof-crush is a critical problem in today’s vehicles.   A recent article in the Detroit News, Claybrook expressed her concern on the urgency of new roof crush standards.  “These are the most preventable injuries in auto crashes. The cardinal principle of occupant protection is the integrity of the passenger compartment.”

Almost 40 years ago, NHTSA adopted Rule 216 of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS). The rule was created as a temporary safety measure,.  FMVSS 216 required roofs to be able to withstand a force of 1.5 times the weight of the vehicle.  NHTSA officials recently proposed updating the regulation with today’s technological advancements by requiring roofs to be able to withstand 2.5 times the vehicle weight in an accident. Nearly every major car manufacturer is opposed to the new regulation which would require them to increase the current for of 1.5 to 2.5 for every vehicle under 5,000 pounds.

FMVSS leaves a major legal loophole open for SUVs weighing more than 5,000 pounds. Vehicles that are over the 5,000 pound mark set by FMVSS 216 are not affected by governmental regulation in regards to their roof. Auto manufacturers are free to design and build these vehicles without the safety standards  that are normally associated with smaller passenger vehicles.

If you or a loved one have been involved in a roof crush accident involving serious injuries, contact the attorneys at Patterson Legal Group, LC today for a free initial consultation. To take on the world’s largest corporations, you need strength, knowledge and experience only experienced roof crush attorneys can provide.  Patterson Legal Group, LC has held major car companies accountable and forced to them compensate our clients for unnecessary deaths and injuries.

Case Results

  • $1,475,000: Highway 50 Auto/Truck Collision
  • $640,000: Accidental Electrocution
  • $500,000: Tow-Truck Operator Struck and Killed
  • $1,500,000: Auto/Auto collision
  • $161,000: Drivers collide at sharp curve in middle of roadway as cornfield obstructed view
  • $290,000: ATV Accident
  • $8,600,000: Auto Accident Judgment
  • $300,000: Recovery for a Shooting Victim

More Results

Testimonials

Crystal M

I used Patterson Legal Group for my disability case and I can’t begin to say enough good things about the entire team. My husband had success getting his disability case won when using them so, I knew right away I would use them as well. I spoke primarily with Nicole and Stephanie up until my […]

Kera B.

Great firm and great staff

Skylar K.

I had been injured in a vehicle wreck in February of 2014. The insurance company handling my claim insisted on low-balling me and giving me the runaround. After nearly two years had passed, I had made no progress in regards to reaching a resolution, that seemed fair and appropriate to me, with the claim representatives […]

Dan S.

I am extremely impressed on how professional, kind and helpful PLG and the staff responded to my claim. They were on top of everything all the time. Couldn’t have done it without them. I will definitely refer PLG to all my family and friends. Thank you so much. Dan S

More Testimonials