Legal Dictionary

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence: reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover based upon the plaintiff’s own negligent contribution to the injury.

  1. Pure comparative negligence:
    Plaintiffs can recover some percentage from a defendant who is liable regardless of the extent of their own negligence.
  2. Modified comparative negligence:
    Plaintiffs are allowed a partial recovery just like pure comparative negligence, until the plaintiff is greater than 50% at fault. If the plaintiff is greater than 50% at fault, in many tort cases they will be barred from recovery. (Some state laws set this number lower.)
Example 1: Plaintiff and defendant both speeding when the two collide. A court finds plaintiff 10% at fault and defendant 90% at fault. Plaintiff has $10,000 in damages. Under pure comparative negligence, plaintiff can recover $9,000. [$10,000 damages x 10% amount of plaintiff’s fault = $1,000 reduction].
Example 2: Plaintiff and defendant both speeding when the two collide. A court finds plaintiff 90% at fault and defendant 10% at fault. Plaintiff has $10,000 in damages. Under modified comparative negligence, plaintiff is barred from recovery because they were greater than 50% at fault.

Free Case Review

Case Results

  • $640,000: Accidental Electrocution
  • $3,540,068: SUV Rollover
  • $529,000: Workers Compensation
  • $850,000 Semi Truck Accident
  • $715,000 Auto Accident
  • $300,000: Recovery for a Shooting Victim
  • $900,000 Auto Accident
  • $250,000: Auto/Bus Collision

More Results

Testimonials

Andrew T.C.

I was very happy with their services , they were a great help.

SG

Just want to say, Thank You, for your time and service. I appreciate you all, and everything you did to help me.

SC

Thanks for your help!

Carol P.

These guys are absolutely awesome!!!!

More Testimonials